Michalski v. Scripps Mercy Hospital: A Win for Both Peer Reviewers and Hospital Boards

In the article, Mr. Brown reports that “Michalski was about sexual harassment, an errant hearing committee decision, and a governing body’s ultimate authority to decide what physician behavior is acceptable in the hospital. In its decision the California Court of Appeal confirmed that a hospital’s governing body may, where permitted by the hospital’s medical staff bylaws, broadly exercise its independent judgment and overturn a Judicial Review Committee (JRC) decision following a peer review hearing.”

As a result of the decision, he argues that the case “demonstrates the wisdom of including in medical staff bylaws the right provisions regarding the standard of review the hospital board must apply when conducting an appellate review of a JRC decision. The board bears ultimate responsibility for the decision and in some rare cases must correct a JRC decision that does not adequately protect patients.”

To read the article, click here.

If you have questions about peer reviews or related issues, please contact one of the Arent Fox professionals listed, or the Arent Fox attorney who regularly handles your legal matters.